Thursday, June 3, 2021

GST Amnesty Scheme & other relief to the GST Taxpayers at 43rd GST Council Meeting

  • Late fee for non-furnishing of returns in FORM GSTR-3B for the tax periods from July, 2017 to April, 2021 has been reduced as under :
    Category of Taxpayers Maximum amount of Late Fee
    Taxpayers having NIL tax liability during the respective tax period Rs.500/- (Rs.250/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
    Other Taxpayers Rs.1000/- (Rs. 500/- each for CGST & SGST) per return

    Reduced rate of late fee would apply if return in FORM GSTR-3B for these tax periods are furnished between 01.06.2021 to 31.08.2021. Relevant notification to implement the above recommendation is being issued.

  • Rationalization of late fee leviable on account of delay in furnishing return in FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR-1 for prospective tax period (June, 2021 onwards)

To reduce burden of late fee on taxpayers, the late fee is being capped, as follows:

Category of Taxpayers Maximum amount of Late Fee
Taxpayers having nil tax liability/ nil outward supplies Rs.500/- (Rs.250/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
Other Taxpayers:
For taxpayers having AATO in preceding FY upto Rs.1.5 crores Rs.2000/- (Rs.1000/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
For taxpayers having AATO in preceding FY between Rs.1.5 crores to Rs. 5 crores Rs.5000/- (Rs.2500/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
For taxpayers having AATO in preceding FY above Rs.5 crores Rs.10,000/- ( Rs.5000/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
  • Rationalization of late fee leviable on account of delay in furnishing return in FORM GSTR-4 by Composition taxpayers for prospective tax periods (FY 21-22 onwards)
    Category of Taxpayers Maximum amount of Late Fee
    Taxpayers having NIL tax liability Rs.500/- ( Rs.250/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
    Other Taxpayers Rs.2000/- (Rs.1000/- each for CGST & SGST) per return

  • Rationalization of late fee leviable on account of delay in furnishing return in FORM GSTR-7 by Tax Deductors at Source for prospective tax periods (June, 2021 onwards)
  1. Late fee payable for delayed furnishing of return in FORM GSTR-7 to be reduced to Rs.50/- per day (Rs.25/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
  2. Maximum amount of late fee is Rs.2000/- (Rs.1,000/- each for CGST & SGST) per return
  • Compliance related relief for GST Taxpayers Amendment in Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules Relaxation in availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC)
105% cap on availment of ITC to be applicable on cumulative basis for tax periods April, May and June, 2021, to be applied in the return FORM GSTR–3B for the tax period June, 2021
  • Compliance related relief for Taxpayers registered under Companies Act
Taxpayers registered under the Companies Act to be permitted to furnish GST returns by using Electronic Verification Code (EVC) instead of Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) till 31.08.2021
  • Compliance related relief for taxpayers who are not under QRMP Scheme
Due date for furnishing details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 for the month of May 2021 to be extended by 15 days. The revised due date is as under :
GST Return Month Due date Extended Due Date
FORM GSTR-1 May 2021 11.06.2021 26.06.2021
  • Compliance related relief for taxpayers who are under QRMP Scheme
Last date for uploading B2B invoices for the month of May, 2021 through Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) to be extended by 15 days. The revised last date is as under:
GST Form Month Last date Extended Last Date
FORM IFF May 2021 13.06.2021 28.06.2021
  • Compliance related relief for Composition Taxpayers
Due date for furnishing Annual return in FORM GSTR-4 for the FY 2020-21 to be extended to 31.07.2021
Now Due Date for GSTR-4, for FY 2020-21 is 31.07.2021
  • Compliance related relief for GST Taxpayers
Now Due Date for ITC-04, for QE March, 2021 is 30.06.2021
Due date for furnishing FORM ITC-04 (intimation of goods sent on job work) for the Quarter ending March, 2021 to be extended to 30.06.2021

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Taxation Aspects of Transfer of Property between Firms and Partners

Background

Prior to substitution by Finance Act, 2021, as per Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act,1961, profit or gains arising on transfer of capital asset on the dissolution of a firm or other association of persons or body of individuals or otherwise, was chargeable to tax as the income of the firm, association of persons or body of individuals, of the previous year in which the said transfer took place. 

Further, the fair market value of the asset on the date of such transfer shall be deemed to be the full value of the consideration received or accruing for the purpose of Section 48.

However, there has been a long drawn dispute on taxation of capital gain under section 45(4) and it involved lot of controversies and some of them are listed below

  1.  Whether the expression “Dissolution of the firm/AOP/BOI or otherwise” as mentioned in Section 45(4) includes reconstitution also?
  2. Whether the provisions would be applicable in case where assets are revalued or self-generated assets are recorded in the books and payment made to partner is in excess of capital contribution
  3. Whether money paid to partner would be taxable in the hands of the firm under section 45(4)?

All these issues have been addressed by Finance Act, 2021 with the insertion of Section 9B and 48(iii) and substituting Section 45(4) w.e.f. Assessment Year 2021-22.

Impact of the Amendments made by the Finance Act 2021, Section-wise 

Important terms for the purpose of the Section 45(4)/9B of the Income Tax Act :

  1. Specified entity means a firm or other association of persons or body of individuals (not being a company or a co-operative society). 
  2. Specified person means aperson, who is a partner of a firm or member of other association of persons orbody of individuals (not being a company or a cooperative society) in any previous year.’
  3. Reconstitution of the specified entity” means, where 

  • one or more of its partners or members, as the case may be, of such specified entityceases to be partners or members; or
  •  one or more new partners or members, as the case may be, are admitted in such specified entity in such circumstances that one or more of the persons who were partners or members, as the case may be, of the specified entity, before the change, continue as partner or partners or  member or members after the change; or
  • all the partners or members, as the case may be, of such specified entity continue with a change in their respective share or in the shares of some of them;

Section 9B- Income on receipt of capital asset or stock in trade by specified person from specified entity

At the time of Reconstitution or dissolution of specified entity-

  •  If a specified person receives any capital asset or stock in trade or both, 
  • then there shall be deemed transfer of capital asset or stock in trade or both in hands of the specified entity in the year in which such capital asset or stock in trade are received by specified person and  
  • Fair Market value of the capital asset or stock in trade shall be deemed to be the full value of the consideration received or accrued and
  •   shall be taxable under head “Capital Gain” or “Profits and Gains of Business and profession” in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Computation of Gain arising from deemed transfer of stock in-trade under section 9B read with Section 28 shall be as follows 

Fair Market value of stock transferred shall be recorded as sale and forms part of the business profit within the provisions of Section 28 of the specified entity.

Computation of Capital Gain arising on deemed transfer of capital asset under section 9B read with Section 48 shall be as follows:



Fair Market value of capital asset as Full value of consideration received or accrued as a result of the transfer of the capital asset

--

Less: Indexed Cost / Cost of acquisition of the asset

--

Less: Indexed Cost / Cost of Improvement of the asset

--

Income taxable under head capital gain

--

 

It is pertinent to note that mere reconstitution or dissolution of specified entity would not require application of provision of Section 9B. The provision becomes applicable when a specified person receives any capital asset or stock-in-trade at a time of reconstitution or dissolution of the specified entity. However, deemed taxability shall arise in the hands of the specified entity only.

Section 45(4)- Capital Gain on receipt of Money or Capital Asset by Specified Person in the hands of the Specified Entity

At the time of Reconstitution of specified entity,

  •  where a specified person receives any money or capital asset or both;
  •  then any profit and gains arising from such receipt of money or capital asset by specified person shall be deemed to be the income of the specified entity under the head “Capital Gains”;
  • in the previous year in which such capital asset or money or both were received by the specified person and  
  • such profit or gains shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula

A = B+C-D

Where,

A = income chargeable to income-tax under the head “Capital gains”;

B = value of any money received by the specified person from the specified entity on the date of such receipt;

C = the amount of fair market value of the capital asset received by the specified person from the specified entity on the date of such receipt; and

D = the amount of balance in the capital account of the specified person in the books of account of the specified entity at the time of its reconstitution without considering increase in the capital account of the specified person due to revaluation of any asset or due to self generated goodwill or any other self-generated asset (if any).

Where the value of A is negative, it shall be deemed to be nil.

For the purpose of this subsection

“Self-generated Goodwill” or “self-generated asset” means goodwill or asset which has been acquired without incurring any cost for purchase or which has been generated during the course of the business or profession.

Explanation- It has been clarified that when a capital asset is received by a specified person from the specified entity in connection with the reconstitution of specified entity, the provisions of this sub-section, i.e., 45(4) shall operate in addition to the provisions of Section 9B and the taxation under the said provisions thereof shall be worked out, independently.

Note- Section 45(4) comes only into the light at the time of reconstitution of a specified entity. It provides for taxability of profit and gains on receipt of capital asset or money in the hands of specified entity which is actually the income of specified person. Further, section 45(4) shall operate in addition to the provisions of Section 9B i.e. At the time of reconstitution, suppose if a specified entity transfers capital asset to its specified person then the same shall be taxable under section 9B as well as 45(4).

Section 48(iii)- Mode of computation of Capital Gain Section 48 provides for the deduction at the time of calculating capital gain from the full value of consideration received as a result of transfer of capital asset. A new clause (iii) has been inserted vide Finance Act 2021 which provides for an additional deduction in respect of capital gain taxed under section 45(4), i.e., deduction shall be allowed in respect of amount chargeable to tax under section 45(4) from the full value of the consideration of the capital asset at the time of transfer, calculated in the prescribed manner. However, the method for the same is yet to be prescribed by CBDT.

Computation of Capital Gain as per amended Section 48 shall be as follows


Full value of consideration received or accrued as a result of the transfer of the capital asset

--

Less: Indexed Cost / Cost of acquisition of the asset

--

Less: Indexed Cost / Cost of Improvement of the asset

--

Less: Amount chargeable to tax under section 45(4) in the hands of specified entity which is attributable to capital asset being transferred

--

Income taxable under head capital gain

--

 

Note- It is important to note that additional deduction shall arise only in case of reconstitution as section 45(4) cover only the reconstitution aspect and to mitigate the impact of double taxation [i.e. taxability under section 9B and 45(4)], clause (iii) has been inserted.

Comparative Analysis of Section 45(4), 9B and 45(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

  • Section 45(4) provides for taxability in the event of Reconstitution of specified entity whereas Section 9B provides for taxability in the event of reconstitution or dissolution of specified entity.
  • For example- At the time of Reconstitution of the firm, if a partner gets capital asset and stock in trade from the firm, there are two transactions involved. First one is relinquishment of his rights as a partner and second is transfer of money or asset by the firm.
  • Former transaction is dealt under the provisions of Section 45(4) and the latter in section 9B. However, in the former transaction income arises in the hands of the partner but as per section 45(4) it is deemed as income of the firm.
  • Thus, the firm would be assessed under section 9B for its own income and under section 45(4) for the income arising to the partner.

Further, in case of reconstitution of firm double taxability will arise once under section 9B and second under section 45(4). To remove the impact of such double taxation, clause (iii) has been inserted to the section 48 which provides for the deduction of the amount attributable to tax under section 45(4) from the full value of consideration received or accrued at the time of transfer of capital asset.

Conclusion

Though the Finance Act, 2021 addressed several debated issues, few clarifications are further required from CBDT with respect to period of holding for capital asset classification for the purpose of Section 9B & 45(4), method of attribution under section48(iii), availability of deduction by virtue of Section 48(iii), bifurcation of amount attributable towards receipt of money and capital asset etc.

Further, the changes have been made applicable from the Assessment Year 2021-22, wherein if partner(s) or member(s) of the firms/AOP/BOI, reconstituted or dissolved during the concerned year received any capital asset, stock and/or money, then the firm/AOP/BOI are required to evaluate the implications of the said amendment.

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Key Provision Amendment of Taxation in Finance Bill 2021

Tax payers can take a sigh of relief as no changes / increase has been proposed in the tax rates in spite of the need to have more funds in the challenging times.

Relief to certain category of senior citizens from return filing requirement

 In order to provide relief to resident senior citizens (aged of 75 year or above) having only pension and interest income accruing to them, an exemption has been proposed from filing the return of income. However, a declaration will have to be filed with specified bank in this regard and bank would be required to compute the income after giving effect to applicable deductions/ rebates and deduct income tax at rates in force.

Liable to tax defined - Section 2(29A)

It is proposed to insert a new clause (29A) to section 2 so as to define the expression “liable to tax”, in relation to a person, which means that there is a liability of tax on such person under any law for the time being in force in any country, and shall include a case where subsequent to imposition of tax liability, an exemption has been provided.

The amendment is in line with judicial pronouncements wherein it has been held that liable to tax does not necessarily imply that taxes are paid in the other contracting state, it is sufficient that contracting state has right to levy taxes. The concept is also relevant to determine if an individual is deemed to be resident under section 6.

Section 10(5)

Considering outbreak of Covid, 19 and travelling possibilities being hindered, Section 10(5) is proposed to be amended to provide tax exemption of cash allowance in the hands of individuals, if any value or assistance is received by or due to such individual in lieu of any travel concession subject to fulfilment of conditions as may be prescribed.

Proposed amendment to be made effective from AY 2021-22 

Section 10(11) and 10(12) 

Payment from provident fund is exempt under Section 10(11) and receipt of accumulated balances from employee recognised provident fund is exempt under section 10(12). It is proposed to provide that such exemption shall not apply to interest income accrued to the extent it relates to the amount or aggregate of the amounts of contribution to such funds made on or after 01st April 2021 in excess of Rs. 2.5 lakhs in the previous year. This amendment would affect taxpayers contributing huge sum to these funds as exemption would be denied to the extent of interest income on the excess sum contributed.

Relief with respect to income from overseas retirement funds

New section 89A is proposed to be inserted to address mismatch in taxation of income from specified overseas retirement accounts maintained by specified person in a notified country. Specified person is a person resident in India who has opened a retirement benefit account in a notified country while being a non-resident in India and a resident in that country. Said income shall be taxed in such manner and in such year as may be prescribed.

It is proposed to shift the taxation of such retirement benefit from accrual basis to receipt basis in India. The aforesaid relief will mainly benefit the NRIs returning to India.

Proceeds from Unit Linked Insurance Plan (Ulip) Section 10(10D)

Any proceeds received under ULIP issued on or after 01st February 2021 shall not be eligible for exemption if annual premium exceeds Rs. 2.5 Lakhs.

Such ULIP shall be treated as capital asset (equity oriented unit) and proceeds shall be taxable as capital gains. Rules for computation of capital gains shall be prescribed.

This amendment intends to put a cap on the total premium paid under ULIPs majority affecting High Net Worth Individuals.

Amendment to section 36(1)(va) and 43B

There have been numerous judicial pronouncements in favour and against taxpayer, on the issue whether contribution toward employee’s provident fund made by an employer after the due date prescribed under labour welfare laws but before the due date of the filing return of income shall be allowed as deduction or not? To address this, it is proposed to insert explanation in section 36(1)(va) and section 43B to clarify that provisions of 43B shall not apply to employees contribution to welfare funds accordingly, deduction shall be allowed under section 36 only if the deposit is made within the due dates prescribed under the relevant labour laws. This will now ensure stricter compliance adherence in the hands of taxpayers.

Depreciation on Goodwill

  1. The long-drawn dispute of whether depreciation can be claimed on goodwill for the purpose of business and profession has been put to rest by the amendments proposed, by specifically carving out goodwill on business and profession as a depreciable asset for income tax purposes.
  2.  It is further proposed to prescribe a specific computation mechanism to determine the written down value and short-term capital gains in case where depreciation on goodwill has already been claimed by the assessee.

This amendment clamps down on depreciation on goodwill which was being claimed by the corporate taxpayers all along relying on the Apex court judgement. It would impact depreciation even on concluded transactions.

Increase in the safe harbour limit under section 43CA and 56

It is proposed to increase the safe harbour limit under section 43CA from 10% to 20% in case of transfer of residential unit subject to following conditions :

  • Transfer takes place between 12th November 2020 to 30th June 2021
  • Transfer is by way of first time allotment to any person
  • Consideration does not exceed Rs. 2 crore

Consequential relief is proposed to be provided under section 56(2)(x) for buyer of the property by increasing the safe harbour from 10 % to 20%.

These amendments would benefit real estate developers and give fillip to real estate sector.

Increase in the threshold for tax audit under section 44AB

It is proposed to increase the threshold limit for tax audit to 10 crores from existing 5 crores to incentivise digital transaction and reduce compliance burden, provided that (i) aggregate amount received for sales/turnover in cash and (ii) aggregate payment (expenditure) in cash does not exceed 5% of said respective amounts. Amendment is effective from AY 2021-22.

Section 44ADA – Presumptive taxation for professionals –

Provisions of presumptive taxation is not applicable to LLP since LLPs are required to maintain books of accounts under LLP Act and benefit of non maintenance of books of accounts under 44ADA cannot be availed. It is proposed to explicitly mention non applicability of section 44ADA to LLPs.

Expanding the scope of slump sale

It is proposed to expand the scope of ‘slump sale’ to include transfer of “undertaking, by any means,” thereby including all types of transfers within the ambit of ‘slump sale’. It is pertinent to note that this amendment would overturn the Bombay High Court judgement in the case of Bharat Bijlee wherein taxability of slump exchange was denied in absence of monetary consideration (in this case consideration was in nature of shares). In substance, transfer in the form of exchange shall also be covered under slump sale (provided other conditions are satisfied).

Section 142

It is proposed to empower prescribed income tax authority to issues notices under section 142 (1) besides assessing officer. This is in line with policy on faceless assessment to enable centralised issuance of notices. 

Revamping of reassessment proceedings

Unlike the erstwhile reassessment provisions where emphasis was on “reasons to believe” , substituted provisions focus on “information with the Assessing officer” i.e., information flagged in accordance with the risk management strategy formulated by the Board from time to time (or) any objection raised by C&AG. It may be noted that considering ‘flagged information based on risk management strategy’ as an ‘information’ so as to warrant assumption of jurisdiction under section 147/148 in all cases shall tantamount to giving unfettered powers to the assessing authorities for reopening assessment.

Section 148A has been inserted to provide that before issuance of notice under Section 148, the Assessing Officer shall conduct enquiries, if required, and provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. After considering reply, the Assessing Officer shall decide, by passing an order, whether it is a fit case for issue of notice under Section 148. Giving opportunity of being heard before initiating reassessment proceedings is a welcome step.

Further, it is proposed to subsume provisions of section 153A/153C of the block assessments in the newly substituted section 148.

Faceless ITAT

With an aim to reduce human interface and cost of compliance it is proposed to introduce faceless proceedings before the ITAT. While creating a faceless ITAT is pathbreaking being one more step towards digitisation,its implementation and practical challenges should be closely examined.

MAT provisions :

115JB is proposed to be amended to provide that dividend income earned by foreign companies shall be reduced from the book profit and related expenditure added back where such income is taxed at lower that MAT rate due to DTAA 

Further, where past year income is included in books of accounts, on account of Advance Pricing Agreement or secondary adjustment, Assessing Officer shall on application made to him recompute the book profits of past years.

Section 10(50)

Equalisation Levy was introduced by India in 2016, on the lines of the recommendations of the OECD BEPS Action Plan aiming to tax revenues generated by ecommerce supply or services made which would not fall under the tax net applying the conventional tax norms.

E-commerce supply or services is defined to mean “online sale of goods” and “online provision of services”. Definition of term “online sale of goods” and “online provision of services” is now expended to include one or more of the following activities taking place online:

(a) Acceptance of offer for sale;

(b) Placing the purchase order;

(c) Acceptance of the Purchase order;

(d) Payment of consideration; or

(e) Supply of goods or provision of services, partly or wholly

Further, it is clarified that Equalisation levy is applicable on e-commerce supply or services irrespective of whether the e-commerce operator owns the goods or provides /facilitates the services.

Income from any specified service on which equalisation levy is applicable shall be exempt as per section 10(50).

Explanation 1 is proposed to be inserted to clarify that the income referred to in this clause shall not include and shall be deemed to have never included income which is chargeable to tax as royalty or Fee for technical service in India under the Income tax Act or DTAA.

Miscellaneous Provision

  1. It is proposed to widen the ambit of provisional attachment u/s. 281B during pendency of any proceeding for imposition of penalty under section 271AAD (penalty for false entry or omission of entry in books of accounts) where the amount or aggregate amount of penalty likely to be imposed exceeds Rs. 2 Crores.
  2. It is proposed to enable infrastructure debt fund to issue zero coupon bond under section 10(48). Further, TDS under section 194A shall not be applicable on paid or payable by infrastructure debt fund
  3. To settle long pending disputes and to reduce litigation, dispute resolution is proposed for small taxpayers through constitution of a Dispute Resolution Committee. Taxpayers with taxable income up to ` 50 lakh and disputed income up to Rs. 10 lakh shall be eligible to approach the Committee.
  4. Section 44DB is proposed to be amended to extend the benefit of various deductions to a case where a primary co-operative bank is converted to a banking company. Section 47 is also proposed to be amended to include transfer of capital asset by a primary co-operative bank to a banking company within its scope. Accordingly, such transaction shall not be treated as a transfer.
  5. Section 72A is proposed to be amended with a view to facilitate strategic divestment by the Government to enable set off and carry forward of loss and allowance of depreciation of amalgamating company to amalgamated company in case of amalgamation of one or more public sector company/companies with another public sector company/companies.
  6. 6. No interest under section 234C is proposed to be charged on shortfall in payment of advance tax on dividend income (except deemed dividend) provided full tax thereon is paid in subsequent instalments 
  7. Section 115AD is proposed to be made applicable to investment division of an offshore banking unit to the extend income is attributable to investment division as Category III portfolio investor under SEBI (FPI) Regulations, 2019
  8. Income tax Settlement Commission is abolished with effect from 1 February 2021.

Conclusion

In this unprecedented time government is walking tightrope aiming to revive the economy with various benefits, tax incentives and measures as announced in this budget.

The Finance Minister rightly remarked in her speech “‘Faith is the bird that feels the light and sings when the dawn is still dark’’. With these measures, the economy will certainly come out of present problems to reflect its true potential sooner than later.

Saturday, February 20, 2021

Rights Issue Strategy for Listed Companies

Background

Rights issue is a primary market offer in which all existing shareholders get an opportunity to acquire additional shares in the company on a pro-rata basis. Every shareholder can use his own discretion while choosing an option to buy shares and may decide to acquire entire or part of the eligible stake while renouncing balance to others.

Though there is no compulsion on any shareholder to subscribe for shares as per his entitlement, often companies offer good discount over prevailing market price and so, usually majority of the shareholders opt for exercising their rights. Any company can raise funds by launching rights issue after complying with the provisions under the Companies Act, 2013, however, if the company is listed on recognised stock exchanges then applicable provisions under multiple SEBI regulations also need to be complied with:

  • SEBI Takeover code, 2011
  • SEBI LODR Regulation, 2015
  • SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2018
  • SEBI Buyback Regulations, 2018

Rights issue can be of different types and the company may choose any one or combination of them to suit their requirements while offering an option to all its shareholders:

1. Based on paid up Status

  • Fully Paid Right Issue
  • Partly Paid Right Issue
2. Based on Renounce ability
  • Renounceable Rights Issue 
  • Non-Renounceable Rights Issue
3. Based on ICDR Regulations 
  • Fast Track Rights Issue 
  • Normal Rights Issue > 50 Cr 
  • Normal Rights Issue < 50 Cr 
Key Process Outline & Basis of Allotment

The companies can opt for ‘Fast- Track Rights Issue’ of more than Rs.50 crores if the conditions laid down in Regulation 99 of SEBI ICDR Regulations are met and in such cases, SEBI has offered multiple relaxations. Otherwise, following standard process has to be followed by the company for the rights issue:

  1. Obtaining approval from the board
  2. Appointment of various intermediaries for the issue including lead manager, registrar, banker, legal advisors, advertisement / PR agency, statutory auditors, etc. Underwriter need not be appointed as underwriting is not compulsory.
  3. Carrying out due diligence review and legal documentation besides determining offer price
  4. Obtaining in-principle approval from the regulator
  5. Fixation of record date in consultation with the lead manager
  6. Sending abridged letter of offer and application forms
  7. Obtaining ASBA facility through bankers
  8. Crediting Right Entitlements in demat accounts through depositories
  9. Opening of Issue (15-30 days) 
  10. Allotment of shares and refund of balance proceeds 

Equity shares will be allotted to eligible shareholders in a pre- determined sequential hierarchy in the following manner:

  1. Shareholders to the extent of their entitlement;
  2. Renouncees to the extent of their entitlement;
  3. If shares are still available then one share to those eligible shareholders having fractional entitlement and who applied for at least 1 additional share;
  4. If shares are still available then to those eligible shareholders who applied for additional shares in proportion to their holding as on the record date;
  5. If shares are still available then to eligible Renouncees who applied for additional shares;
  6. If anything left even after aforesaid allotment then it would be treated as unsubscribed portion of the issue. It is generally distributed among the shareholders and renouncees who have applied for any additional shares.

Normal rights issue of more than Rs. 50 crores may usually take upto 6 months for completion. However, in case of ‘Fast-Track Rights Issue’ or issue having size less than Rs. 50 crores, the process can be completed in a span of around 3 months.

Pricing Mechanism and Impact

The companies have been given complete freedom to determine pricing for the rights issue as per their choice, however, usually significant discount is offered over the prevailing market price in order to reward loyal shareholders and make offer attractive. Given the regulatory approvals required for issuing of shares below face value, traditionally offer price has been at the face value or higher.

Due to discounted price of rights issue, the price of shares gets diluted. Hence, it is likely to go down with the increase in total number of shares after issue. Share price after issue can be estimated mathematically and is called as “Theoretical Ex-Rights Price” (TERP). Following is the formula of TERP:

TERP = [(Existing Shares X Key Process Outline & Basis pital Market Existing Price) + (Rights Shares X Offer Price)] / Total Shares

Value of Right can also be determined as the difference between TERP and offer price using following formula:

Value of Right = TERP – Offer Price Example: XYZ Company announces rights issue of 1:2 i.e.1 share for every 2 shares held at a concessional offer price of Rs.70 while the current market price is Rs. 100. Then, TERP and Value of Right can be calculated as below:

TERP = [(100 X 2) + (70 X 1)] / 3 = 90

Value of Right = 90 – 70 = 20

The shares of XYZ company may trade at ` 90 ex-rights and value of Right will be ` 20. However, it should be noted that this is merely an estimate on the basis of mathematical calculations and actual price may substantially differ based on market sentiments. Further, reduction in price may be temporary and it can even go up if there are good prospects.

Right Entitlements & Options to Shareholders

Rights Entitlements (REs) are the standard rights issued by the company to all its existing shareholders for subscribing to new shares. REs are offered to shareholders on pro-rata basis in proportion with their existing equity shares held as on the record date. If any shareholder is holding shares in physical form then he will have to provide details of his demat account for getting REs.

REs are issued in dematerialised form and have separate ISIN, however, they can be traded in online as well as offline mode. Separate scrip code is issued by stock exchanges for trading of REs and while its opening price is decided by the exchanges, subsequently it is determined by the market dynamics. Anybody can purchase REs and also apply for the rights issue in the given proportion during the issue period. However, if no application is made by the purchaser of REs on or before closing date of issue then such REs will lapse. Once trading in REs stop then it cannot be extended again even if there is an extension of rights issue.

Eligible shareholders can exercise any of the following options as per their discretion during the rights issue:

  1. Apply for their rights fully as per their REs
  2. Apply for their rights fully as per their REs and also apply for excess rights shares
  3. Apply for their rights partly as per their REs and renounce balance REs
  4. Apply for their rights partly as per their REs but don’t renounce balance REs
  5. Renounce their REs fully 
  6. Neither apply for rights shares nor renounce REs 

Advantages of Rights Issue

Since inception, rights issue has been a highly popular fund raisingstrategy which has been beneficial to both the corporates as well as shareholders. Cash-strapped companies can adopt this strategy to mobilize funds when they really need it. Following are key advantages to the companies:

  1. Very rare chance of failure
  2. Fastest mode of raising capital without incurring any extra debt
  3. Economical option wherein costs like underwriting, advertisement, etc can be saved
  4. Motivation to existing shareholders due to offer to subscribe shares at discounted rates
  5. Preferred mode to attract investors as compared to preferential allotment due to relaxation in lock-in requirements

The shareholders are also benefitted in the event of rights issue as below:

  1. Existing shareholders can continue to control the company if rights are not renounced
  2. Lucrative option to increase stake at a price lower than prevailing market rates
  3. SEBI has permitted shareholders having physical certificates to exercise their rights by providing demat account details
  4. SEBI has also allowed usage of R-WAP platform to resident individual shareholders and HUF investors.

The Promoters can also take an advantage to smartly increase their overall stake and control through rights issue:

  1. Under SEBI Takeover Code, the Promoters can acquire upto 5% in a financial year, however, through rights issue the Promoters can acquire even beyond 5% without triggering Open Offer under Regulation 3(2) provided issue price is less than ex-rights price.
  2. REs can be bought or sold by the Promoters even during Trading Window closure period as per SEBI’s circular dated 23-7-2020.

Recent Relaxation by SEBI 

Due to ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, there is an unprecedented economic crisis resulting into huge scarcity of funds.

Every company has to compulsorily wait for at least 1 year after completion of buyback process as per Regulation 24 of SEBI Buyback Regulations, 2018 if it wishes to raise further capital in any manner including rights issue. However, SEBI has temporarily reduced this timeline from 1 year to 6 months in order to give relief to corporates in view of acute liquidity challenges faced by them.

Further, SEBI has issued various circulars after March 2020 in order to rationalise overall process and gave multiple relaxations to listed companies for mobilising funds through rights issues:

  1. Filing of Letter of Offer to SEBI is not required for rights issues upto issue size of ` 50 crores which was earlier limited to Rs.10 crores only
  2. Waiver of compulsory 90% minimum subscription criteria, subject to conditions 
  3. Conditional relaxation to companies for ‘Fast-Track Rights Issue’ in case of pending show-cause notices provided disclosure is made about potential adverse impact
  4. Truncated disclosures by restricting financial statements for last year instead of 3 years

With abovementioned positive measures taken by SEBI, rights issues have now become preferred mode of raising funds. During last few months, more than a dozen big listed companies had successfully completed rights issue process and they also got great response from the investors. Following are few examples of mega issues:

  • Reliance Industries – Rs. 53,124 crores
  • M&M Financial Services – Rs. 3,089 crores
  • Shriram Transport Finance – Rs. 1,500 crores
  • Aditya Birla Fashions –Rs. 995 crores

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Higher Rates of TDS for ITR Non-Filers U/s 206AB

Section 206AB-TDS/TCS on non filer at higher rates 

Presently with introduction of new section, the purchaser/Seller should be additional care regarding  TDS/TCS rates, as another Section 206AB enables to deduct/collect TDS/TCS at higher rates in the event that the purchaser/seller(as the case might be). 

Higher Rates of TDS for ITR Non-Filers U/s 206AB

The new TDS rate in this part is higher of the followings rates:- 

  • Double the rate indicated in the applicable section of the Act; or
  • Double the rate or rates in applicable; or 
  • The rate of 5 (five) percent 

New Provision 206AB of the Act would apply on any whole or earn or sum paid, or payable or credited, by an individual (in this alluded to as deductee) to a "Specified individual". 

Specified person” has been defined as a person who has not filed the returns of income for both of the 2 Assessment Years relevant to the 2 Previous Years which are immediately before the Previous year in which tax is required to be deducted or collected, as the case may be 

More conditions which should be checked are: 

1) Time limit for tax return form under provision (1) of Section 139 of the Act has lapsed for both these years. 

2) Aggregate of Tax deducted at source and Tax gathered at source for his situation is Rs.50,000 or more in every one of these two earlier years. 

3) Specified individual will exclude a non-occupant who doesn't have a lasting foundation in India. 

Additionally this part will not matter where the expense is needed to be deducted under segments 192, 192A, 194B, 194BB, 194LBC or 194N of the Act. This infers that a higher pace of TDS will not be pertinent on the accompanying segments where full measure of expense is needed to be deducted: 

192: TDS on Salary 

192A: TDS on Salary to Government workers 

194B: TDS on Lottery 

194BB: TDS on Horse Riding 

194LBC: TDS on Income in regard of Investment in Securitization Trust 

194N: TDS on Cash Withdrawal more than 1 crore. 

How might the ITR Filing be checked (for appropriateness of Section 206AB)? 

The Government would give another utility on it is Income Tax Software wherein a deductor/Collector, on entering the PAN of the purchaser/vender, would get the subtleties of his ITR Filing. 

Be that as it may, as a reasonable practice the assesse should keep a duplicate of the provider's ITR for the previous two Financial Years as an affirmation to appropriately deduct/gather TDS/TCS according to the relevant rate. 

This arrangement may be an extra weight on the citizen, anyway it is an extra advance taken by the Government to get individuals who don't record their ITRs in any event, when their assessment has been deducted/gathered and is appeared in 26AS. 

More compliance burden on Taxpayer

This may more compliance burden of all the taxpayers, to collect necessary documents from their sellers, regarding ITR filed by them for Previous years. Many Sellers may not even wish to give details of their ITR with their purchases. In such a case, either the Seller will have to suffer higher TDS or commercially the cost of TDS may need to be taken by the purchaser. Thus, practically, the new section will certainly grow the compliance burden for the taxpayers. It may be notice that NRI, not having a permanent establishment in India are spared from this Section and therefore, NRIs having no presence in India but entitled to receive non-salary income from India may not be affected by this Section.

The intention of the govt. appears to be in making purchasers themselves force their sellers to comply with income tax provisions and file their Income Tax return and its decided to more income tax compliance. However, it may create a compliance burden for taxpayers having a more number of sellers, to whom such Section would apply. We will need to wait and watch how industry reacts to this Section and complies of this section.

This Provision will be applicable from 1st July, 2021.

Coin Master Free Spin and Coin Rewards Daily Link 100 Spin

Coin Master Free Spin and Coin daily 100+ Coin Master Free Spin and Coin daily 100 spin Today 07/05/2022 ...